CARTHA

   

Get a copy of one of our books here!

Get a copy of one of our books here!

  • 7 / Sincere Fun, 2024
    • 7-1 / I / Call for Contributions
  • 6 / Learning Architecture, 2021
    • 6-1 / I / Call for Contributions
  • 5 / Invisible Structures, 2020
    • 5-1 / I / Prologue
    • 5-2 / II / Essays
  • 4 / The Possible Progress, 2019
    • 4-1 / I / The Possible Progress
    • 4-2 / II / Answer Series
  • 3 / Building Identity, 2018
    • 3-1 / I / ASSIMILATION
    • 3-2 / II / APPROPRIATION
    • 3-3 / III / REJECTION
    • 3-4 / IV / CONCILIATION
    • 3-5 / V / THE CASE OF DWELLING
  • 2 / The limits of fiction in Architecture, 2017
    • 2-1 / I / THE TEXT ISSUE
    • 2-2 / II / THE IMAGE ISSUE
  • 1 / The Form of Form, 2016
    • 1-1 / I / How To Learn Better
    • 1-2 / II / The Architecture of the city. A palimpsest
    • 1-3 / III / LISBOA PARALELA
  • 0 / Relations, 2015
    • 0-0 / Ø / Worth Sharing
    • 0-1 / I / Confrères
    • 0-2 / II / Mannschaft
    • 0-3 / III / Santisima Trinidad
  • imprintingidentity / Imprinting Identity, Special Issue 2019
    • imprintingidentity / Imprinting Identity
  • makingheimat / Making Heimat, Special Issue 2017
    • makingheimat / Making Heimat
  • About
  • Contributors
  • FRIENDS
    ✕

    Post-Critical Urbanism

    Philippe Rahm

    CHAPTER III: THE INDIVIDUALITY OF URBAN ARTIFACTS, ARCHITECTURE Architecture as Science   When the villager had to get water from the village square fountain or food from the market place, social and political life was born in the city. Villagers didn’t arbitrarily choose to gather for a chat in open spaces, outside the shelter of […]

    CHAPTER III: THE INDIVIDUALITY OF URBAN ARTIFACTS, ARCHITECTURE

    Architecture as Science

     

    When the villager had to get water from the village square fountain or food from the market place, social and political life was born in the city. Villagers didn’t arbitrarily choose to gather for a chat in open spaces, outside the shelter of their homes. Similarly, the arcade was invented to protect inhabitants from snow or sun. The air pollution in 19th century cities gave rise to boulevards for ventilation, which, consequently, caused new social behaviors like strolling. These fundamental causes of urban design were ignored during the 20th century thanks to the enormous use of energy by pumps, motors, fridge, heating systems and air conditioning, which cause today’s greenhouse effect.

    Overcoming the legacies of energy, food and climatic constraints, urban theory from the 1970s, like Aldo Rossi’s Tendenza and American Pop art, lead to cities that have been designed in response to only social and cultural values, which are really the effects of urban form rather than its causes. Out of this came a tendency for urban designers and architects to use a morpho-typological analysis of the city, wherein they study and repeat more or less precisely the formal drawing and figurative language of the city in its current state, regardless of climate or physiological necessity.

    Following this logic, the designers of urban form sought to understand the “spirit of place”, its formal and material identity, and to establish a plastic and cultural language – making use of a grammar based on semantic reference, analogy, allusion, and narration — which propagates more or less deviance, irony, and nostalgia. This analytical method slowly emerged in the 1960s as an architectural extension of the critical philosophical theories proposed as a response to the disaster of World War II (1939-45) such as Adorno and Horkheimer’s critical theory coming from the Frankfurt School or Foucault’s postmodernism in France, deeply disillusioned by the progressive and scientific objectives of the modernity of the early 20th century.

    Modernity began, full of hope, as a mechanism through which mankind could progress and find happiness. It ended with the bloodshed of World War II and the atomic bomb. From the late 1960s, Critical Theories have denounced philosophers’ ideas of progress — technical, scientific, or architectural — accusing them of being responsible for the world’s disasters. The Critical Theories in architecture instead favored linguistic and semantic analysis that evolved from the post-modern economical affluence of the end of the 20 century and tourism development, a perfect match.

    We have seen in recent years the exhaustion of critical methods which actually had the effect of stifling architectural invention with repetition and formalism. By banishing the scientific and medical tools, they had focus only on the narrative and plastic discourse, choosing the subjective over the objective, and obscuring the physiological and climatic causes of urbanization. These methodologies, however, lack the tools and theory to adequately address the very immediate issues of global warming and dwindling natural resources.. How to answer by irony to the Global warming? Why to tell a story on the depletion of resources instead of fighting it? We think today that science is not the cause of the catastrophes of the 20th century but it was his use in a univocal political way without accepting difference, alterity and multiplicity, that was the cause.

    Our position is in no way a return to genesis of our modernity, but rather a generation of a new phase of architectural history that is post-post-modern, or maybe “post-critical”, as defined Hal Foster in his essay “Post-Critical” 1. We want to reengage physiology and meteorology as new tools for the urban and architectural design, in thinking critically by welcoming the multiplicity, diversity, and alterity of spaces and atmospheres, embracing the comfortable and uncomfortable, hot and cold, good and bad, wet and dry, clean and polluted, and the gradations between these extremes, to allow the user the freedom to use and interpret spaces in order to ensure his or her free will.

    We want to abandon the modern univocal vision of space. We do not want to design uniform atmospheres that would only provide so-called perfect climates, because we also want the free choice for everybody between colder or warmer spaces, sunny or cloudy, clean or polluted. In this sense, we are the heirs of critical thinking, and not the neo-modern. Our goal is to re-engage science, medicine and technology with critical thinking, and to expand the toolset of critical thinking to include medical tools and physiological analyses. Our design brings variety of atmospheres and diversity of situations into the outdoor and indoor spaces, abandoning the so-called perfect and the univocal controlled modern architecture, keeping the field of the architectural design as open as possible, diversified, multiple, by accepting and designing either so-called good and less good places. Thus, the future of architecture and urbanism is post-critical.

    We need to reengage the basic physiological and climatic necessities of the contemporary world in order to invent a new urban language, new forms, urban spaces to address these needs and raise new political, social, and cultural behaviors.

    Philippe Rahm is a swiss architect, principal in the office of Philippe Rahm architectes, based in Paris, France. His work, which extends the field of architecture from the physiological to the meteorological, has received an international audience in the context of sustainability. He starts to teach architecture design at the GSD, Harvard University, USA, in Fall 2014. In 2002, Mr. Rahm was chosen to represent Switzerland at the 8th Architecture Biennale in Venice, and was one of the 25 Manifesto’s Architects of Aaron Betsky’s 2008 Architectural Venice Biennale. He is nominee in 2009 for the Ordos Prize in China and in 2010 and 2008 for the International Chernikov Prize in Moscow where he was ranked in the top ten. He has participated in a number of exhibitions worldwide (Archilab, Orléans, France 2000; SF-MoMA 2001; CCA Kitakyushu 2004; Centre Pompidou, Paris, 2003-2006 and 2007; Manifesta 7, 2008; Louisiana museum, Denmark, 2009; Guggenheim Museum, New-York 2010). In 2007, he had a personal exhibition at the Canadian Centre for Architecture in Montreal. Mr. Rahm was a resident at the Villa Medici in Rome (2000). He was Headmaster at the AA School in London in 2005-2006, Visiting professor at the Mendrisio Academy of Architecture in Switzerland in 2004 and 2005, at the ETH Lausanne in 2006 and 2007, at the School of Architecture of the Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts of Copenhagen in 2009-2010, in Oslo at the AHO in 2010-2011. From 2010 to 2012, he held the Jean Labatut Professorship in Princeton University, USA. He has lectured widely, including at Yale, Cooper Union, UCLA and the ETH Zürich. His recent work includes the First Prize for the 70 hectares Taichung Gateway Park in Taiwan currently under construction, an office building of 13000 m2 at La Défense in France for the EPADESA; a convective condominium for the IBA in Hamburg, Germany; the White Geology, a stage design for contemporary art in the Grand-Palais on the Champs-Elysées in Paris in 2009 and a studio house for the artist Dominique Gonzalez-Foerster in 2008. Monographic books include “Physiological architecture” published by Birkhaüser in 2002, “Distortions”, published by HYX in 2005, “Environ(ne)ment: Approaches for Tomorrow”, published by Skira in 2006, “Architecture météorologique” published by Archibooks in 2009 and “Constructed atmospheres” published by Postmedia, Milan, Italy, in 2014.

    2 – 20
    Essay
    PDF